Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 311% better in Rust than MXZ - 267 vs 65 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $749.0 vs $4849.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Rust than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $11.52 vs $18.16 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.16/FPS
63.43612334801762%
Price, $
$4849.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54889 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
65
24.344569288389515%
Value, $/FPS
$11.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
18.182638105975197%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
15.627906976744185%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
64.11925976696368%
Multi-Core
7692
39.17893342841135%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |