Key Differences
In short — CSL outperforms ERAZER on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of CSL Gaming PC
- Performs up to 15% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ERAZER - 70 vs 61 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
ERAZER Desktop PC
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
ERAZER Desktop PC
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
59%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
52%
GPU Winner
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ERAZER Desktop PC
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | CSL Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
