Key Differences
In short — Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 outperforms ERAZER on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value. The better performing Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 is 626 days newer than ERAZER.
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than ERAZER - 163 vs 121 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Nov 13th, 2023
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 288 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Nov 13th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
Nov 13th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
96%
Multi-Core
8910
83%
Nov 13th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
100%
Multi-Core
10745
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2023 |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
