Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Dell XPS 8960 Tower on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - 436 vs 354 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
25th Variation
FPS
354
81%
Value, $/FPS
$5.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1848
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,848 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
25th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
31%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Core i7-13700K
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2840
100%
Multi-Core
17611
100%
CPU Winner
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
98%
Multi-Core
15636
89%
Dell XPS 8960 Tower Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
