Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Dell XPS 8950 - 175 vs 145 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
32nd Variation
FPS
145
83%
Value, $/FPS
$14.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2167.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,167.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 368 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
32nd Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
91%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
96%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
95%
Multi-Core
15445
99%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |