Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Vega 3.1 outperforms the cheaper Dell XPS 8960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 46% better in F1 22 than Dell XPS 8960 - 233 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing F1 22 than Dell XPS 8960 - $10.58 vs $12.68 per FPS
Advantages of Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than Centaurus Vega 3.1 - $2029.0 vs $2464.88
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2464.88
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,464.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2423 minutes ago
20th Variation
FPS
160
68.6695278969957%
Value, $/FPS
$12.68/FPS
83.4384858044164%
Price, $
$2029
100%
Buy for $2,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
48.5634477254589%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
50.04354136429608%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Core i9-14900
null-core
Single-Core
2946
100%
Multi-Core
15863
96.57250700109581%
Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 4 TB SSD |
