Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Vega 3.1 outperforms the cheaper AVGPC Whirlwind on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing AVGPC Whirlwind is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than AVGPC Whirlwind - 105 vs 96 FPS
Advantages of AVGPC Whirlwind Gaming PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Centaurus Vega 3.1 - $1599.0 vs $2464.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Centaurus Vega 3.1 - $16.66 vs $23.48 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.48/FPS
70.95400340715501%
Price, $
$2464.88
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,464.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4076 minutes ago
FPS
96
91.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$16.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1599
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
79.01037509976058%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
80.4644412191582%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | AVGPC Whirlwind Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
