Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Pollux 2T outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC
- Performs up to 131% better in F1 22 than Acer Nitro 50 - 136 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 22 than Acer Nitro 50 - $10.07 vs $11.85 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than Centaurus Pollux 2T - $699.00 vs $1369.99
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1369.99
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 379 minutes ago
Aug 2nd, 2020 • 11th Variation
FPS
59
43%
Value, $/FPS
$11.85/FPS
85%
Price, $
$699
100%
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 380 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Aug 2nd, 2020 • 11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Aug 2nd, 2020 • 11th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 2nd, 2020 • 11th Variation
Core i5-10400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1438
50%
Multi-Core
5751
39%
Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 2nd, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i5-10400F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
