Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Pollux 2T outperforms the more expensive Dell XPS 8960 Tower on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC
- Performs up to 87% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - 43 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - $1369.99 vs $1565.00
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - $31.86 vs $68.04 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$31.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1369.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $1,565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
60%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Tower Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |