![[2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B0D2DKJH5F.jpg)
Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) - 207 vs 205 FPS
Advantages of [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 15% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $2749.0 vs $3249.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $13.41 vs $15.7 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.7/FPS
85%
Price, $
$3249.99
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307522 minutes ago
FPS
205
99%
Value, $/FPS
$13.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
