Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Alienware Aurora R16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Alienware Aurora R16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 71% better in World of Tanks than Alienware Aurora R16 - 592 vs 346 FPS
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 61% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $3029.0 vs $7849.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $8.75 vs $9.88 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.88/FPS
89%
Price, $
$7849.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
58th Variation
FPS
346
58%
Value, $/FPS
$8.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$3029
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $3,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
58th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
58th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
58th Variation
Core i9-14900K
null-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |