Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MXZ - 127 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $869.0 vs $2849.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $9.76 vs $22.44 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$22.44/FPS
43%
Price, $
$2849.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13817 minutes ago
Buy for $869 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13838 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
