Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms SYSTEMTREFF High-End on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Monster Hunter: World than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - 271 vs 189 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
141st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
141st Variation
Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
56%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
141st Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
99%
Multi-Core
15118
97%
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
