Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 271% better in Overwatch 2 than MXZ - 397 vs 107 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 84% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $769.0 vs $4749.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $7.19 vs $11.96 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
397
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.96/FPS
60%
Price, $
$4749.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
15%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
8 TB HDD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |