Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 82% better in Far Cry 3 than MXZ - 198 vs 109 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 82% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $849.0 vs $4749.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $7.79 vs $23.99 per FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.99/FPS
32%
Price, $
$4749.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5917 minutes ago
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
8 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |