Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper HP Envy on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing HP Envy is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 111% better in World of Tanks than HP Envy - 590 vs 279 FPS
Advantages of HP Envy Desktop PC
- Up to 71% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $2299.00 vs $7899.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $8.24 vs $13.39 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.39/FPS
62%
Price, $
$7899.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Buy for $2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
27%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
27th Variation
Core i7-14700K
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2939
100%
Multi-Core
19317
98%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | HP Envy Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i7-14700K |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 4 TB SSD |