Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ALCPOK on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ALCPOK is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 129% better in Dirt 5 than ALCPOK - 259 vs 113 FPS
Advantages of ALCPOK Gaming PC
- Up to 86% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $959.99 vs $7049.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $8.50 vs $27.22 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.22/FPS
31%
Price, $
$7049.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Buy for $959.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | ALCPOK Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
