Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ASUS ROG G16CH (2022) on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 144% better in Battlefield IV than ASUS ROG G16CH (2022) - 490 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield IV than ASUS ROG G16CH (2022) - $9.9 vs $19.9 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS ROG G16CH (2022) Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $3999.0 vs $4849.99
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
490
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4849.99
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3240 minutes ago
FPS
201
41.0204081632653%
Value, $/FPS
$19.9/FPS
49.74874371859297%
Price, $
$3999
100%
Buy for $3,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19.233370913190527%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15.426356589147286%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | ASUS ROG G16CH (2022) Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
