Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Proton 2 outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 30% cheaper than Centaurus Proton 2 - $2949.99 vs $4196.95
- Up to 25% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Centaurus Proton 2 - $14.6 vs $19.34 per FPS
Advantages of Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - 217 vs 202 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
202
93.08755760368663%
Value, $/FPS
$14.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2949.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,949.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75684 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.34/FPS
75.49120992761117%
Price, $
$4196.95
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,196.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
56.50507328072153%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53.41085271317829%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |