Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MXZ outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 49% better in No Man's Sky than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 100 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $799.0 vs $929.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $7.99 vs $13.87 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
67
67%
Value, $/FPS
$13.87/FPS
57.60634462869503%
Price, $
$929
86%
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5247 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
62.461899179366945%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
46.85427135678392%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
85.39479689639434%
Multi-Core
7692
86.32996632996634%
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
