Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — NSX GAMING outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of NSX GAMING PC
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Tanks than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 139 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $799.0 vs $929.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing World of Tanks than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $5.75 vs $8.08 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
115
82.73381294964028%
Value, $/FPS
$8.08/FPS
71.16336633663366%
Price, $
$929
86%
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 447 minutes ago
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
93.70383397819205%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
65.56962025316456%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
85.39479689639434%
Multi-Core
7692
86.32996632996634%
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | NSX GAMING PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
