Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGICIAN AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGICIAN AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ACEMAGICIAN AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Mini Gaming PC
- Up to 88% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $599.0 vs $4849.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $18.72 vs $21.85 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 594% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ACEMAGICIAN AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Mini - 222 vs 32 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
32
14.414414414414415%
Value, $/FPS
$18.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$599
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6577 minutes ago
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.85/FPS
85.67505720823797%
Price, $
$4849.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
15.873731679819619%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
8.186046511627906%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ACEMAGICIAN AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Mini Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 6900HX | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| Radeon 680M | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
