Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ABS Cyclone Aqua outperforms the cheaper STGAubron on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than STGAubron - 172 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing No Man's Sky than STGAubron - $7.56 vs $7.66 per FPS
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than ABS Cyclone Aqua - $1049.99 vs $1299.99
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1299.99
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $1,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
95%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
90%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
22nd Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
87%
Multi-Core
10125
65%
ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700F | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
