Key Differences
In short — ABS Cyclone Aqua outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Performs up to 38% better in Escape From Tarkov than MXZ - 184 vs 133 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than ABS Cyclone Aqua - $849.0 vs $1399.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than ABS Cyclone Aqua - $6.38 vs $7.61 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.61/FPS
83%
Price, $
$1399.99
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
