Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI Pulse 17 AI 17 Inch 16:10 QHD+ 240Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 113 days newer than MSI Pulse 17 AI 17 Inch 16:10 QHD+ 240Hz.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 21% better in Forza Horizon 5 than MSI Pulse 17 AI 17 Inch 16:10 QHD+ 240Hz - 69 vs 57 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jan 9th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
57
83%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
May 1st, 2024
FPS
69
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jan 9th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 9th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 9th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
MSI Pulse 17 AI 17 Inch 16:10 QHD+ 240Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17" | Screen Size | 16" |
