Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 469 days newer than ASUS.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than ASUS - 148 vs 135 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | ASUS Laptop |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 18th, 2023 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14.5" |
