Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI Katana GF66 15.6" 244Hz FHD on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 596 days newer than MSI Katana GF66 15.6" 244Hz FHD.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than MSI Katana GF66 15.6" 244Hz FHD - 236 vs 231 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 13th, 2022
FPS
231
98%
Value, $/FPS
$5.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,199.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3181 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 13th, 2022
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 13th, 2022
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
94%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 13th, 2022
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
97%
Multi-Core
11484
88%
MSI Katana GF66 15.6" 244Hz FHD Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 13th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
244 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
