Key Differences
In short — Lenovo LOQ outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 38% better in Remnant II than Asus TUF A16 - 44 vs 32 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 50% cheaper than Lenovo LOQ - $1140.99 vs $2285.35
- Up to 30% better value when playing Remnant II than Lenovo LOQ - $35.66 vs $51.27 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$51.27/FPS
70%
Price, $
$2285.35
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,285.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 317 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
32
73%
Value, $/FPS
$35.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
null-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |