Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 643 days newer than HP Victus.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 114% better in Battlefield V than HP Victus - 167 vs 78 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jul 28th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 28th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
40%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 28th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
85%
Multi-Core
8539
74%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
HP Victus Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 28th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 256 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
