Key Differences
In short — HP OMEN 16.1" FHD 165Hz outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP OMEN 16.1" FHD 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than ASUS TUF A16 - 65 vs 58 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 17% cheaper than HP OMEN 16.1" FHD 165Hz - $1399.0 vs $1679.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than HP OMEN 16.1" FHD 165Hz - $24.12 vs $25.83 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.83/FPS
93.37979094076655%
Price, $
$1679
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4011 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
58
89.23076923076924%
Value, $/FPS
$24.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900
null-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
91.00957995578482%
Multi-Core
11626
70.77803482284185%
HP OMEN 16.1" FHD 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
