Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MALLRACE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 575% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than MALLRACE - 135 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than MALLRACE - $1399.0 vs $1699.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than MALLRACE - $10.36 vs $85.0 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
FPS
20
14.814814814814813%
Value, $/FPS
$85/FPS
12.188235294117646%
Price, $
$1699.99
82%
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.636684303350968%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
35.28114663726571%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MALLRACE Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5825U |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
