Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 is 1356 days newer than GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 46% better in Elden Ring than GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance - 79 vs 54 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Apr 15th, 2020
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 15th, 2020
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
73.92 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
98%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 15th, 2020
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
57%
Multi-Core
5396
38%
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AERO 17 XB Thin Light Performance Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
