Key Differences
In short — Dell G7 16 7620 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Dell G7 16 7620 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS TUF A16 - 136 vs 135 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 34% cheaper than Dell G7 16 7620 - $1399.0 vs $2119.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Dell G7 16 7620 - $10.36 vs $15.59 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.59/FPS
66.45285439384222%
Price, $
$2119.99
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,119.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52876 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
135
99.26470588235294%
Value, $/FPS
$10.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
124.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
249.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
72.6923076923077%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
72.67628205128206%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
99.87868985038415%
Multi-Core
11626
89.12910150260657%
Dell G7 16 7620 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
