Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 243% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI GF63 - 103 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI GF63 - $19.6 vs $25.63 per FPS
Advantages of MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $769.0 vs $2019.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2019
38%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32768 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
30
29.126213592233007%
Value, $/FPS
$25.63/FPS
76.47288333983614%
Price, $
$769
100%
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
null-core
Single-Core
1519
55.969049373618276%
Multi-Core
5470
33.300864483136486%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i5-10500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
