Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF 15.6” FHD 144Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF 15.6” FHD 144Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 51% better in Minecraft than ASUS TUF 15.6” FHD 144Hz - 656 vs 435 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming 15.6” FHD 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 61% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $779.99 vs $2019.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $1.79 vs $3.08 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
656
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
58.11688311688311%
Price, $
$2019
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33061 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
435
66.3109756097561%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$779.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $779.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 7535HS
null-core
Single-Core
1708
62.93294030950627%
Multi-Core
6668
40.59417995860222%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming 15.6” FHD 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
