Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 210% better in F1 23 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 183 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 23 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $11.03 vs $13.03 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $769.0 vs $2019.0
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2019
38%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32819 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
59
32.240437158469945%
Value, $/FPS
$13.03/FPS
84.65080583269379%
Price, $
$769
100%
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
50.44215180545321%
Multi-Core
4008
24.400340922927064%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
