Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF 15.6" 144Hz FHD on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF 15.6" 144Hz FHD is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 64% better in Dead Space than Asus TUF 15.6" 144Hz FHD - 74 vs 45 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF 15.6" 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $759.0 vs $2019.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $16.87 vs $27.28 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.28/FPS
61.84017595307918%
Price, $
$2019
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32766 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
45
60.810810810810814%
Value, $/FPS
$16.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$759
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $759 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i5-11400H
null-core
Single-Core
1818
66.98599852616066%
Multi-Core
6333
38.554730305613056%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | Asus TUF 15.6" 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i5-11400H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
