Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 29% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Asus TUF A16 - 146 vs 113 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than ASUS TUF - $1140.99 vs $1499.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS TUF - $10.1 vs $10.27 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
113
77%
Value, $/FPS
$10.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
99%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
