Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 35% better in Dead Space than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 62 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than MSI Katana GF76 17 - $938.83 vs $999.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dead Space than MSI Katana GF76 17 - $15.47 vs $21.72 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$938.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $938.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1047 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
97%
Multi-Core
7887
85%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |