Key Differences
In short — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $899.0 vs $1179.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Asus TUF A16 - $8.03 vs $10.53 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
69%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
