Key Differences
In short — Lenovo LOQ outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 9% cheaper than Lenovo LOQ - $949.62 vs $1049.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Lenovo LOQ - $18.63 vs $19.07 per FPS
Advantages of Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Asus TUF A16 - 55 vs 52 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
12th Variation
FPS
52
95%
Value, $/FPS
$18.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $949.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Buy for $1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
12th Variation
20th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Ryzen 7 8845HS
null-core
Single-Core
2486
100%
Multi-Core
11671
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
