Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 (2024) outperforms the more expensive MALLRACE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 243% better in Elden Ring than MALLRACE - 72 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than MALLRACE - $960.99 vs $1699.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than MALLRACE - $13.35 vs $80.95 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
1st Variation
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$960.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $960.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31798 minutes ago
FPS
21
29.166666666666668%
Value, $/FPS
$80.95/FPS
16.491661519456454%
Price, $
$1699.99
56%
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.636684303350968%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
35.28114663726571%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | MALLRACE Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5825U |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
