Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MALLRACE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 600% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MALLRACE - 98 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than MALLRACE - $1399.0 vs $1699.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MALLRACE - $14.28 vs $121.43 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
14
14.285714285714285%
Value, $/FPS
$121.43/FPS
11.759861648686485%
Price, $
$1699.99
82%
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.636684303350968%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
35.28114663726571%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
MALLRACE Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5825U | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Radeon Vega 8 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
