Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF FX507 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF FX507 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than ASUS TUF A16 - 189 vs 188 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 32% cheaper than ASUS TUF FX507 - $1119.00 vs $1649.00
- Up to 32% better value when playing Lost Ark than ASUS TUF FX507 - $5.95 vs $8.72 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.72/FPS
68%
Price, $
$1649
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
188
99%
Value, $/FPS
$5.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
93%
Multi-Core
10780
93%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF FX507 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
