Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF FX507 2023 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF FX507 2023 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 23% better in Dead Space than Asus TUF A16 - 76 vs 62 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 31% cheaper than ASUS TUF FX507 2023 - $1140.99 vs $1649.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS TUF FX507 2023 - $18.4 vs $21.7 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.7/FPS
85%
Price, $
$1649
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
62
82%
Value, $/FPS
$18.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
99%
GPU Winner
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF FX507 2023 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
