Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 135% better in Deathloop than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 80 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $949.62 vs $1159.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Deathloop than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $11.87 vs $34.09 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53%
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
70%
Multi-Core
4008
43%
12th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-10300H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |