Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 120% better in F1 23 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 130 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $809.0 vs $1079.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing F1 23 than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $6.22 vs $18.29 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
4th Variation
FPS
59
45.38461538461539%
Value, $/FPS
$18.29/FPS
34.00765445598688%
Price, $
$1079
74%
Buy for $1,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6157 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
4th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
69.70468431771894%
Multi-Core
4008
43.18500161620515%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
