Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 103% better in Rocket League than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 302 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $949.0 vs $1079.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Rocket League than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - $3.14 vs $7.24 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
4th Variation
FPS
149
49.337748344370866%
Value, $/FPS
$7.24/FPS
43.370165745856355%
Price, $
$1079
87%
Buy for $1,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
302
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
4th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
69.70468431771894%
Multi-Core
4008
43.18500161620515%
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
