Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI Katana GF76 17 outperforms the more expensive Asus TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 400% better in Remnant II than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - 15 vs 3 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - $999.0 vs $1099.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Remnant II than Asus TUF F15 144Hz - $66.6 vs $366.33 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
15
100%
Value, $/FPS
$66.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
70%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
72%
Multi-Core
4008
51%
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-10300H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |