Key Differences
In short — ASUS Rog Strix Scar outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Rog Strix Scar Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF A16 - 103 vs 98 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 57% cheaper than ASUS Rog Strix Scar - $1119.00 vs $2619.00
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Rog Strix Scar - $11.42 vs $25.43 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.43/FPS
45%
Price, $
$2619
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,619 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 748 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
98
95%
Value, $/FPS
$11.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 738 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
70%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
89%
CPU Winner
ASUS Rog Strix Scar Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
